Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0806120180480030375
´ëÇÑ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö
2018 Volume.48 No. 3 p.375 ~ p.388
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale?Short-Form in Cancer Patients
Song Chi-Eun

Kim Hye-Young
So Hyang-Sook
Kim Hyun-Kyung
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in patients with cancer.

Methods: The original scale was translated into Korean using Brislin¡¯s translation model. The Korean Short-Form and the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-General were administered to 164 Korean patients with cancer using convenience sampling method. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 23.0. Construct validity, criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency reliability of the Korean Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form were evaluated.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a four-factor solution that explained 60.6% of the total variance. Factor loadings of the 15 items on the four subscales ranged .52~.86. The four-subscale model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis (Normed ¥ö2=1.38 (p=.013), GFI=.92, SRMR=.02, RMSEA=.05, TLI=.94, and CFI=.95), and criterion validity was demonstrated with the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-General. Cronbach¡¯s alpha for internal consistency of the total scale was .83 and ranged .68~.81 for all subscales, demonstrating sufficient test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: The Korean version showed satisfactory construct and criterion validity, as well as internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
KEYWORD
Adaptation, Psychological, Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed